Legal Opinion

Cosmopolitan Bank v. Blumberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

This is an action against an indorser on a promissory note.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff was and now is a domestic banking corporation, duly organized under the banking laws of the State of New York.

“ Second. Upon information and belief that heretofore, and on or about the 9th day of March, 1925, the Wacht Construction Corporation, by Jacob Wacht, President, for value, duly made and executed its promissory note in writing payable to its own order, a true copy of which is as follows: “ ‘ $60,000 New York City, March 9, 1925.
“ ‘ Four Months After Date We Promise to Pay to the Order of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Youngs v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Wittemann v. . SandsNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Kahnweiler v. SalomonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1919
  4. Lafayette Trust Co. v. LacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Cosmopolitan Bank v. BlumbergNew York Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API