Legal Opinion

Cosmopolitan Bank v. Blumberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGibbs, J.

Plaintiff instituted an action to recover $60,000 on

a promissory note made by a third party and indorsed by the defendant. The complaint sets forth a copy of the note but not the indorsement of the defendant. It then pleads that before maturity and the delivery of the note, the defendant for the purpose of giving credit thereto, and of inducing the plaintiff to accept the note for discount, and of being charged thereon as an indorser, indorsed the same. Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that these allegeations do not constitute a good pleading. Rule 94 of the Rules of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kahnweiler v. SalomonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cosmopolitan Bank v. BlumbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API