Legal Opinion
Roe v. Ferguson
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 2, 1974No. Civ. A. 74-315PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DUNCAN, District Judge.
On September 16, 1974, this Court granted summary judgment for plaintiffs in this action. The Court held that 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a) (10) (A), the section of the Social Security Act which sets mandatory guidelines for states having medicaid programs which are funded by the federal government, does not permit the State of Ohio to exclude abortion services from those medical services which are provided welfare recipients under the Ohio program. Appropriate injunctive relief was entered against the defendants, Joseph Ferguson, Auditor of the State of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hamlin Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Doe v. WohlgemuthDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mamula v. Satralloy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Matter of Baldwin United Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Accident Fund v. BaerwaldtDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984
- Cass County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Wold Properties, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977