Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Rosenblath

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 3, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hetherington, S.

The respondent and the decedent were husband and wife, and during her lifetime made several investments in bonds and mortgages. In the earlier investments the bonds and mortgages were made simply to the decedent and the respondent. However, in those made during a period of five years immediately preceding her death, the instruments were made payable to both parties or the survivor. As to the latter, the executor makes no claim, but as to the former contends that the decedent had a one-half interest therein. The respondent-husband in his answer lays claim to all and sets up as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edson v. . ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. In re the Estate of RosenblathNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. Kingsbury v. KingsburyNew York Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StrongNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  2. In re the Estate of RosenblathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API