Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Rosenblath

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 24, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hetherington, S.

This is a discovery proceeding and it appears that decedent and her husband, who survives, held certain bonds and mortgages wherein both were named as mortgagees, some with and others without the word “ survivor ” added. The respondent (husband) lays claim to all, urging that his wife and he agreed to make mutual wills leaving the entire property of each to the other respectively, that he fulfilled his part of this contract but that she neglected so to do. The executor concedes that such of the instruments as contain the word “ survivor ” belong to the respondent, but resists…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of AkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Utica National Bank & Trust Co. v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LamerdinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  2. In re the Estate of RazouxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. In re the Estate of RosenblathNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of RazouxNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API