Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Rosenblath
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 15, 1933Published
1Opinion of the Court
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county unanimously affirmed, without costs. (Matter of Ulman, 238 App. Div. 864; Edson v. Parsons, 155 N. Y. 555; Wallace v. Wallace, 216 id. 28; Hermann v. Ludwig, 186 App. Div. 287.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ. [146 Misc. 424.]
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edson v. . ParsonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Hermann v. LudwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- In re the Estate of RosenblathNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re the Specific Performance of the Agreement between Ulman & UlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933