Spalding v. Spalding

OPINION

LEWIS, Judge.

This appeal arises from the holding of the Trial Judge that alimony awarded to respondent was in futuro and not in solido. Respondent has assigned the following three errors which we discuss together:

1. The Trial Court erred in construing the original award of alimony in this cause to be an award of alimony in futuro rather than of alimony in solido.

2. The Trial Court erred in reducing the amount of alimony originally awarded to Appellant in that said original award of alimony was an award of alimony in solido, had already become a final judgment not appealed from when the…