Legal Opinion

Chelsea Factors, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 2, 1960No. 372-55PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff sues, claiming that it is the assignee of the proceeds of a contract between the Government and Suburban Frosted Foods, Inc. The Government asserts numerous defenses. The plaintiff is a corporation that engages only in the business of lending money on the security of specific merchandise. Its customers are wholesalers who need funds with which to purchase merchandise for resale, and who can pledge with the plaintiff as collateral their warehouse receipts or other evidence of title to the merchandise. When the borrower resells the merchandise, he has to obtain the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arlington Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  2. Sterling Millwrights, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Produce Factors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  4. Beaconwear Clothing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API