Legal Opinion
Brandt v. Milbrath
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 2002No. 20010294PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Eldora Brandt appeals from a Northeast Judicial. District Court’s judgment and order denying her motion for a new trial on the grounds that the district court abused its discretion in excluding the testimony of one of Brandt’s witnesses and that the jury’s verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow one of Brandt’s witnesses to testify and there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.
I
[*112] Eldora Brandt and Aldon Mil-brath were in. a traffic accident. Brandt…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- The First National Bank of Kenosha, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ethel M. Rudy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Cook v. StenslieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Hill v. RolleriCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Williston Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Steiger Tractor, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Korynta v. KoryntaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Rittenour v. GibsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Comstock Construction, Inc. v. Sheyenne Disposal, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Wagner v. MiskinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Livinggood v. BalsdonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.