Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Rothman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 10, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered on or about May 6, 1997, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs’ cross motion to prohibit defendants’ use of corporate funds to defend this action, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent that defendants are enjoined from expending corporate funds in defense of this action, and otherwise af-. firmed, except that the appeal from that part of said order which granted defendant Scharfs motion to dismiss the action as against him, unanimously dismissed as superseded by the appeals from the judgment entered May…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of Purnell v. LH Radiologists, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In the Estate of Purnell v. LH Radiologist, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Janssen v. Incorporated Village of Rockville CentreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Donovan v. RothmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. Ninth Space LLC v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. Donovan v. RothmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Booth Oil Site Administrative Group v. Safety-Kleen Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API