Legal Opinion
In the Estate of Purnell v. LH Radiologist, P. C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 25, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The findings of the Special Referee, which clearly defined the issues and resolved matters of credibility, were substantially supported by the record and, therefore, properly confirmed (Matter of Mayer v National Arts Club, 223 AD2d 440; Kaplan v Einy, 209 AD2d 248, 250-251). Further, both the IAS Court and the Special Referee properly concluded that stock certificates, while evidence' of shareholder status, are not necessary for, or determinative of, its creation (Rocha Toussier y Asociados v Rivero, 184 AD2d 397, 398; Matter of Benincasa v Garrubbo, 141 AD2d 636, 638).
Respondents’ arguments…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Benincasa v. GarrubboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Kaplan v. EinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Beck v. MotlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Rocha Toussier y Asociados, S.C. v. RiveroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Mayer v. National Arts ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Donovan v. RothmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Donovan v. RothmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Watson v. ChristieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Donovan v. RothmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Himani v. MojawallaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996