Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul J. Raimondo, United States of America v. Carol Bello, United States of America v. James Richard Bello
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 4, 1984No. 82-5163, 82-5186 and 82-5187PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Per curiam
James Bello, his wife, Carol Bello, and Paul Raimondo were convicted by a jury of conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. In addition, James Bel-lo was convicted of distributing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848. The jury also forfeited James Bello’s interests in three properties under 21 U.S.C. § 848(a)(2) as the profits of his continuing criminal enterprise.
As the government properly concedes, the distribution and conspiracy charges in this case are lesser included…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jeffers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. John GrammatikosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Michael M. Busic, United States of America v. Anthony LaroccaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Gerald Vontsteen, A/K/A Skip VontsteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Robert Covelli, David Frederick and Darwin MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. SandiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Richard H. ThierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.