Flippen v. . Lindsey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J".
We think the record evidence which tends to show the whole transaction, the relationship of the parties, their interests in the matter, and to fix the payee with notice thereof, is competent as bearing upon the defenses of want of consideration, failure of consideration, suretyship and the statute of limitations. Barnes v. Crawford, 201 N. C., 434, 160 S. E., 464.
It is permissible to show by evidence aliunde that one, ostensibly a joint promisor or obligor, is in fact a surety. Insurance Co. v. Morehead, 209 N. C., 174, 183 S. E., 606; Davis v. Alexander, 207 N. C., 417, 177 S.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. MoreheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. CliftonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Welfare v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Barnes v. . CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Stocks v. Cannon.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Western MacHinery Company, a Corporation v. Northwestern Improvement Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Bradsher v. MortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Lee v. . ChambleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Spillman v. Forsyth Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Lee v. . ChambleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944