Legal Opinion

Spokane County v. Miotke

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 12, 2010No. 28352-6-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶1 The superior court reversed a Growth Management Hearings Board of Eastern Washington (Board) order, requiring Spokane County (County) to perform certain review requirements before reducing an existing urban growth area (UGA) boundary. The superior court based its decision on res judicata principles without reaching alternative theories to affirm. Kathy Miotke, Julia McHugh, Neighborhood Alliance of Spokane, and Palisades Neighborhood (collectively Ms. Miotke) appeal, contending res judicata does not apply. In response, the County raises several additional grounds to affirm the superior…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Rains v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. Montgomery v. EngelhardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Peggy Montgomery and Dwight Montgomery, et ux v. Glen L. Engelhard, et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Scotsman Guide, Inc., V. Brian SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API