Legal Opinion

Schreiber v. German-American Hail Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1890PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Clay county, refusing a new trial after a trial before Mills, J., and verdict of $3,876.15 for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

This is an action upon three policies insuring growing crops against loss or damage by hail. Each policy contained a condition that, in case any of the representations or statements made in the written application are untrue, “this policy shall be null and void.” Under this condition, one defence alleged is that the application represented that the land was free from incumbrances, whereas it was subject to mortgages and liens. The policies issued June 29, 1881. The loss or damage occurred September 4, 1881. In February following the defendant took judgment against the insured upon the unpaid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Fishbeck v. Phenix Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Home Mutual Life Ass'n v. RielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Huntley v. PerryNew York Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. MichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co. v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  4. Continental Insurance v. VanlueIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Staats v. Pioneer InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1909

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API