Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Federal Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 15, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11 N.J. Super. 611 (1951)

78 A.2d 846

BEATRICE HARTMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,

v.

FEDERAL SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Law Division.

Decided February 15, 1951.

Mr. Morris Edelstein, attorney for petitioner-appellee.

Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Horner (Mr. John J. Monigan, Jr., appearing), attorney for respondent-appellant.

HARTSHORNE, J.C.C.

This case arises on a petition for alleged increased permanent disability to petitioner's back, 15% compensation having been originally paid, an award of 50% of total having been made November…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Allied Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  2. Brown v. Allied Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  3. Flanagan v. Charles E. Green & SonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  4. Newcomb v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  5. Selak v. Murray Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. O'Donnell v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. Beaty v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Kozinsky v. Edison Products Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. McDougle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API