State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
An award of compensation for a carpenter’s loss of a finger in using his power saw at home after sustaining an industrial injury to his eye must be sustained if substantial evidence supports the commission’s finding that the injury to the eye proximately caused the loss of the finger. Petitioner defines causation narrowly and maintains the carpenter’s “negligence” destroyed it. We do not believe that, as a matter of law, this court, accepting petitioner’s definition of causation, can on this record upset the commission’s finding. As an alternate reason in support of the award we submit that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Western Pac. R. R. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Reinert v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Wiseman v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Mitchell v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Starr v. Charlotte Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2022
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.