Legal Opinion

McDougle v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1964No. 36374Published

1Opinion of the Court

64 Wn.2d 640 (1964)

393 P.2d 631

CECIL McDOUGLE, Appellant,

v.

THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Respondent.[*]

No. 36374.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

June 25, 1964.

William A. Stiles, Jr., for appellant.

The Attorney General, John J. Quine and Franklin K. Thorp, Assistants, Bell, Ingram & Smith, and Louis A. Bell, for respondent.

HILL, J.

We are here concerned with an application for the reopening of a claim for treatment because of a pre-existing industrial injury.

This case points up a misunderstanding shared by the Department of Labor and Industries, the Board of Industrial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Head Drilling Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Wilber v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Phillips v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Claim of Sullivan v. B & a Construction, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Kill v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API