Rodgers v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LOCKWOOD, Justice:
The issue presented by this case is essentially one involving successive scheduled injuries to the same extremity under A.R. S. § 23-1044. 1
The pertinent facts are as follows: In 1964, the claimant petitioner William F. Rodgers suffered his first industrial injury-consisting of the loss of two of the fingers ■and the ulnar half of the palm of his right Tiand. This first injury resulted in a Commission award of scheduled benefits under AR.S. § 23-1044, subsec. B for a 45 per cent functional loss of use of the right hand. As a result of a subsequent industrial injury in 1968…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ossic v. Verde Central MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- McKinney v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Morris v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Woods v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- All Star Coach, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Van Sickle v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Special Fund Division v. TaborCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Bozman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.