Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1973No. 10700-PRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, Justice:

The issue presented by this case is essentially one involving successive scheduled injuries to the same extremity under A.R. S. § 23-1044. 1

The pertinent facts are as follows: In 1964, the claimant petitioner William F. Rodgers suffered his first industrial injury-consisting of the loss of two of the fingers ■and the ulnar half of the palm of his right Tiand. This first injury resulted in a Commission award of scheduled benefits under AR.S. § 23-1044, subsec. B for a 45 per cent functional loss of use of the right hand. As a result of a subsequent industrial injury in 1968…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ossic v. Verde Central MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. McKinney v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Morris v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Woods v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. All Star Coach, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Van Sickle v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Special Fund Division v. TaborCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Bozman v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API