Legal Opinion

State v. De Lucia

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 22, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

63 N.J. Super. 90 (1960)

164 A.2d 81

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

MARIO DE LUCIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted September 12, 1960.

Decided September 22, 1960.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and HETFIELD.

Mr. Mario De Lucia, appellant pro se.

Mr. Stanley E. Rutkowski, Mercer County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Mr. Edward J. Phelan, Assistant Prosecutor on the brief).

2Per curiam

Defendant appeals from the denial, without formal answer by the State and without a hearing, of his application for a writ of habeas corpus by the Superior…

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. PohlabelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. State v. CynkowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. State v. BallardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. State v. CiniglioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. State v. ZeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API