Legal Opinion
State v. Zee
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 9, 1951PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
16 N.J. Super. 171 (1951)
84 A.2d 29
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
GEORGE B. ZEE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Decided October 9, 1951.
Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.
Mr. George B. Zee, pro se, for the appellant.
Mr. Mitchell H. Cohen, Prosecutor of Camden County (Mr. Benjamin Asbell, Assistant Prosecutor, appearing), attorney for the respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
The defendant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus attacking his 1941 conviction and sentence and on the basis thereof the writ was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. LutzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- In Re Application of ZeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- In Re Application of GrahamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- In Re CarusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- In Re the Application of ScridlowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. CynkowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State v. McCallNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- State v. SturnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Worbetz v. GoodmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- State v. PhillipsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.