Scott v. Harman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record and on the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the contending parties;
And it appearing that the District Court held valid and infringed Claims 1 and 2 of the patent in suit, Harman No. 2,142,-896, relating to improvements in fastening; ordered a reference to a Master for an accounting of damages; and granted a permanent injunction against further infringement by appellant or his agents;
And it appearing that the findings of fact of the District Court upon which its conclusions of law and decision were based are supported by…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harman v. ScottDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1950
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stamicarbon, N v. V. Escambia Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Engineered Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Applied Mechanical Technology, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1984
- Metalock Repair Service, Inc., and Lois R. Morrison v. Hal W. HarmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Heckerthorn Manufacturing & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1961
- Metalock Repair Service, Inc. And Lois R. Morrison v. Hal W. HarmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.