Legal Opinion
Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Heckerthorn Manufacturing & Supply Co.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided December 27, 1961No. Civ. No. 3791PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, Chief Judge.
This is an action for infringement of two patents brought by Monroe Auto Equipment Company against Heckethorn Manufacturing and Supply Company. The plaintiff Monroe is a corporation of Michigan with its principal place of business at Monroe, Michigan and is engaged in the manufacture of equipment used on automobiles including shock absorber devices. Heckethorn is a Colorado corporation which has its *250principal place of business at Dyersburg, Tennessee and is also engaged in the business of manufacturing shock absorber devices for automobiles. The complaint alleges that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Muncie Gear Works, Inc. v. Outboard, Marine & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- General Motors Corp. v. Estate Stove Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Tights, Inc. v. The Honorable Edwin M. Stanley, Chief Judge, United States District Court Forthe Middle District of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Superior Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Aircraftsmen, Inc. v. Aircraft Equipment CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1965