Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp. v. Unknown Successors, Trustees & Assigns of Oklahoma Royalty Corp.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
The petition stated three causes of action. Service by publication was had on the defendants. Judgment was entered by default for the amount asked on all three causes. Subsequently successors in interest to defendants filed a motion to open up the judgment, and an answer. The trial court allowed this motion. Plaintiff has appealed.
The first cause of action, after alleging the corporate existence of, the plaintiff, alleged that the Oklahoma Royalty Corporation was organized under the laws of New York, had never qualified to do business in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Albright v. WarkentinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Leslie v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Smalley v. BowlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Zimmerman v. RoseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Withers v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Campbell v. Nako CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Fischer v. KippSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Baker v. ErbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Campbell v. Nako CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967