Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Nako Corporation

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1967No. 44,686PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

This appeal is a sequel to Campbell v. Nako Corporation, 195 Kan. 66, 402 P. 2d 771. Defendants, B. W. Klippel and Alleen P. Klippel, in said case brought themselves within the provisions of K. S. A. 60-309 and were let in to defend. The action was brought for cancellation of an oil and gas lease.

The case was returned to the court below and a trial resulted in judgment for plaintiffs, A. D. Campbell and Ava Campbell. The defendants appeal from this judgment on the ground they were not given their day in court. The trial court did not permit…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HolmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Albright v. WarkentinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. Renner v. Monsanto Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Wagner v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. McCulloch v. DodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Washington National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Pierce v. MelzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API