Legal Opinion

Chappell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1929No. 19965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “Testimony as to offenses or acts other than the particular larceny charged in the accusation was admissible as tending to connect the accused with the larceny charged, or to show his course of conduct, or motive, intent, or bad faith, or a common scheme or plan of related offenses.” Goldberg v. State, 20 Ga. App. 162 (2) (92 S. E. 957); Lee v. State, 8 Ga. App. 413 (3) (69 S. E. 310); McDuffie v. State, 17 Ga. App. 342 (5) (86 S. E. 821), and cit.; McCrory v. State, 11 Ga. App. 787 (5) (76 S. E. 163), and cit. Under the above-stated ruling and the facts of the instant case the trial judge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  2. Goldberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. McDuffie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. McCrory v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Bennings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Brunson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API