Bennings v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. While a defendant can not be charged with separate and distinct offenses in one count of an indictment, offenses of the same nature and differing only in degree may be joined in one count of the same indictment; and offenses not of the same nature, but blended together by concurrent acts so that they constitute but one transaction, may likewise be so joined. The test is whether the acts charged in the indictment relate to but one transaction. Mitchell v. State, 6 Ga. App. 554 (65 S. E. 326); Lawrence v. State, 10 Ga. App. 786 (74 S. E. 300); Ramsey v. State, 33 Ga. App. 77 (125 S. E. 777).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Chappell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Ramsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Rank v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.