Goldberg v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of larceny; from city court of Savannah—Judge Rourke-. January 9, 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.
1. There was sufficient evidence to warrant the inference that the crime of simple larceny was committed by the defendant. A witness for the State testified that he saw two persons put several sacks of cement on a wagon, whereupon he approached and ascertained that one of these persons was a negro unknown to him and the other was the defendant. There is nothing to suggest that the defendant did not participate in the asportation of the stolen goods except his statement to the jury.
’ 2. There is no merit in the 2d, 3d, 4th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 9th grounds of the amendment to the motion for a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Bates v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Ray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- McDuffie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Diggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Scudiere v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Newsome v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.