Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Lyons

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 31, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

These are quo warranta proceedings brought by the Attorney General for and in behalf of the Commonwealth, alleging that the defendants, “not regularly and lawfully conducting a general express business,” were granted permits, unobjectionable in form, to transport intoxicating liquors for hire and reward by the mayor and aldermen of the city of Brockton, *537a city in which licenses of the first five classes for the sale of intoxicating liquors are not granted, contrary to the provisions of St.‘1906, c. 421, as amended by St. 1911, c. 423; wherefore prayers are made that the defendants severally…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McLean v. Mayor of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Attorney General v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Attorney General v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. State ex rel. Walker v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Attorney General v. City of SalemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mengel v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Landis v. ValzSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. Lommen v. GravlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API