Attorney General v. City of Salem
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.
This is an information in the nature of a quo warranta. The defendants have demurred; and the only question before the court is, whether upon the facts stated in the information it can be sustained.
Under the St. of 1864, c. 268, “ for supplying the city of Salem with pure water,” the said city has constructed works for supplying the inhabitants with water at an expense of a million dollars or more, and has issued scrip or bonds to that amount. The thirteenth section of said act provides that “ the city council shall establish such price or rents to be paid for the use of the water, as to…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Attorney General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Attorney General v. City of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Attorney General v. Tudor Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- State ex rel. Circuit Attorney v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.