Legal Opinion

Jeffers v. Convoy Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1986No. Civ. 4-85-1574PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.

Before the court is an appeal by Convoy Company, C. Dennis McCorkle, and Edward Vaughn from an order issued July 9, 1986 by a United States Magistrate granting plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Defendants claim that the Magistrate erred in granting the motion because it was untimely and the amended claims are futile. Plaintiff asserts that defendants were not prejudiced by the amendment and that his claims are viable. The parties have submitted several memoranda on these issues.

28 U.S.C. § 636 governs the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matthis v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Collyard v. Washington CapitalsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
  3. Freier v. Independent School District No. 197Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Holloway v. DobbsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  5. Jenson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ulrich v. City of CrosbyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  2. Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  3. Quality Refrigerated Services, Inc. v. City of SpencerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  4. Cook v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
  5. White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. WaterhouseDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API