Legal Opinion

People v. Carrizoza

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 20, 2018No. Appeal 3–16–0051UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O'Brien

¶ 1 Defendant, Jose A. Carrizoza, appeals the denial of his postconviction petition, alleging that the case should be remanded for further postconviction proceedings where counsel filed a Rule 604(d) certificate instead of a Rule 651(c) certificate and failed to amend defendant's pro se petition See Ill. S. Ct. R. 604(d) (eff. Dec. 3, 2015); R. 651(c) (eff. Feb. 6, 2013). We reverse and remand with directions.

*163 ¶ 2 FACTS

¶ 3 Defendant was charged with unlawful possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver ( 720 ILCS 570/401(a)(2)(D) (West 2008) ). Defendant filed a motion to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. SuarezIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. GuestIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. PerkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CarrizozaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  2. People v. SheltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  3. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API