Legal Opinion
Prentice v. Bertken
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 1942No. Civ. 2657PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
Appellant appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after respondents’ general demurrer to appellant’s amended complaint had been sustained without leave to amend.
Briefly summarized, the amended complaint alleged: that plaintiff was doing business under the fictitious name of “Smileage Company”; that defendant Anderson was the Justice of the Peace of the Fourth Township in Kern County; that defendants Scott and Palmer were, respectively, District Attorney and Deputy District Attorney of Kern County; that defendant Bertken was a California Highway Patrol Officer; that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Wight v. RindshopfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Holliday v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Pearson v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- White v. BrinkmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- White v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Chauncey v. NiemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Perry v. MeikleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Webb v. YoumansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Oppenheimer v. TamblynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.