Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Brown
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGr. Egbert Witmer, J.
In this declaratory judgment action plaintiff asks the court to determine that it is not obligated on its casualty insurance policy, issued to defendant Willie Brown, to defend him or to pay any judgment which may be recovered against him. The Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Cor*695poration, hereinafter referred to as the MVAIC, has been permitted to intervene as a defendant, and it is a principal defender.
The evidence shows that on April 3, 1959 defendant Willie Brown purchased of plaintiff a policy of insurance protecting him in the operation of his automobile. He then gave his address…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Ashland Window & Housecleaning Co. v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Allstate Insurance v. MangerNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Allstate Insurance v. MatthewsNew York Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ferguson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. BlerschNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. DeLoshNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- In re the Arbitration between Crump & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & GoldbergNew York Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.