Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marylin G. Diamond, J.
The instant action arises out of a dispute between the City of New York (the City) and the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York (the PBA), which represents nearly 35,000 New York City police officers, as to the manner in which their collective bargaining disputes are to be resolved. The City seeks a declaratory judgment declaring unconstitutional section 1 of chapter 13 of the Laws of 1996 (Section 1), which enables the State’s Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) to invoke its jurisdiction when collective bargaining…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Church of St. Paul & St. Andrew v. BarwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Mount St. Mary's Hospital v. CatherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Hotel Dorset Co. v. Trust for Cultural ResourcesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- City of New York v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of the City of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996