Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of the City of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 12, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin Diamond, J.), entered April 15, 1996, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, granted plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment, and declared chapter 13 of the Laws of 1996 unconstitutional on the ground it violates the Home Rule provision of the State Constitution and that the Board of Collective Bargaining continues to have exclusive jurisdiction over collective bargain*423ing impasses between the City and its police officers, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly declared chapter 13 of the Laws…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adler v. DeeganNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Matter of Osborn v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. City of New York v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of New York v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API