Legal Opinion
Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernard J. Malone, Jr., J.
The motions of the plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to collectively as the PBA) brought on by orders to show cause dated December 15 and 26, 2000, and the cross motion of the City of New York and Mayor Giuliani (hereinafter referred to collectively as the City) dated December 28, 2000, are denied as moot. There remains for determination the following: the motion of the PBA for summary judgment declaring chapter 641 of the Laws of 1998 to be constitutional and interpreting the legislation as placing jurisdiction of scope of bargaining and/or the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Brusco v. BraunNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Matter of Mayor, Etc., of New York (Elm St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- City of New York v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Brusco v. BraunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of the City of New York Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Roe v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- PBA v. City of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2001