Legal Opinion

Gray v. Madigan

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided June 18, 1992No. 3:91-0986PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOHN T. NIXON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Billy Gray, a professional trainer of Tennessee Walking Horses, brings this action under 15 U.S.C. § 1825(d)(6), 28 U.S.C. § 2201, and 28 U.S.C. § 1331, seeking a declaration from this Court that the procedures used in administrative hearings conducted pursuant to the Horse Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1821-1831, are constitutionally deficient. Defendant has moved to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, claiming (1) that Congress vested exclusive jurisdiction over such matters with the courts of appeals, 15 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. City of Rochester v. BondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Billy Gray v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API