Legal Opinion

Fettig Canning Co. v. Steckler, Judge

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 4, 1951No. 10324PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJOR, Chief Judge.

This matter is here by reason of an order heretofore entered by this court directing respondent, a Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, to show cause why such court should not retain jurisdiction of the cases subsequently referred to. The show cause order issued in response to a petition for mandamus. Respondent, in answer to the petition, prayed that the relief requested be denied and the petition for mandamus dismissed. The cases are two actions brought by the United States of America as libels of information in the United States…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Robertson v. Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Hipolite Egg Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. MacKSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Gulf Research & Development Co. v. LeahyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  3. Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co. v. IgoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  4. United States v. One 1974 Cessna Model 310r Aircraft, Etc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
  5. United States v. ReidDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API