Legal Opinion

Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp. v. Dintino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and third-party complaint reinstated against Great Lakes Motor Corporation and Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. Memorandum: Third-party defendant Great Lakes Motor Corporation (Great Lakes) moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the third-party complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Supreme Court, without notifying the parties to that action of its intent to do so, "deemed” the motion to dismiss to be a motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment in favor of Great…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rich v. LefkovitsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Conroy v. SwartoutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Marsico v. Southland Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Marshall v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Jillsunan Corp. v. Wallfrin Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Lee v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Bondanella v. RosenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Bridgehampton National Bank v. SchaffnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Diamond Roofing Co., Inc. v. PCL Props., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API