Legal Opinion

Marsico v. Southland Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1989PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages under General Obligations Law § 11-101 (Dram Shop Act) and for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated April 6, 1987, as dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is modified by (1) adding to the first decretal paragraph after the words “so much of’ the words “the first, second and third causes of action of the”; (2) deleting the third decretal paragraph and substituting therefor a provision dismissing, on the court’s own motion, so much of the first, second…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mihlovan v. GrozavuNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. McNally v. AddisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Matalavage v. SadlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Conroy v. SwartoutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Delamater v. KimmerleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Fried v. Jacob Holding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. McArdle v. 123 Jackpot, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp. v. DintinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Stanley Tulchin Associates, Inc. v. VignolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Raynor v. C.G.C. Grocery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API