Clauss v. Baumgartner
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
This case involves accretions claimed by adjacent riparian owners on the west bank of the Arkansas River in Logan County. The appellants insist that the accretions should be apportioned according to the rule stated in Malone v. Mobbs, 102 Ark. 542, 145 S. W. 193, 146 S. W. 143 and reiterated in Hamilton v. Horan, 193 Ark. 85, 97 S. W. 2d 637. The appellees recognize the rule of these cases; but claim that in this case there was an agreement as to the boundary line, and that such agreement is decisive of the case.1
Appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Clauss, owned lands…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Payne v. McBrideSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Robinson v. GaylordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Malone v. MobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Butler v. HinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Peebles v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Trx v. MeffordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967