Legal Opinion
Claybrooks v. Primus Automotive Financial Services, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided January 18, 2005No. CIV.3:02-0382PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TRAUGER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants PRIMUS Automotive Financial Services, Inc. and PRIMUS Financial Services (collectively “PRIMUS”) (Docket No. 155), in which defendants seek summary judgment as to plaintiffs LaTonya Clay-brooks, Major Gooch, Valerie McSterling, and Arlesia Frelix. The plaintiffs have filed a response (Docket No. 175), and defendants have replied (Docket No. 183). For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ Motion will be granted.
Factual Background and Procedural History 1
Defendant PRIMUS Automotive…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Joseph S. v. HoganDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Miller v. Countrywide Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Davis v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2005
- Archer v. NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2007
- Haug v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.