James C. Conrad v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
After he was unsuccessfully prosecuted on charges involving an illegal gambling operation, James C. Conrad, a twenty-six-year veteran police officer, brought a Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) action against the federal government alleging false arrest, false imprisonment, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution. Conrad now appeals a summary judgment in favor of the government and a judgment on the merits in favor of the government. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
Conrad’s appeal assigns error to three rulings by the district court: (1) the summary judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Tekle Ex Rel. Tekle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Gonzalez Ex Rel. A.F. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Roberts v. McAfee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Bolt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Soldano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.