Legal Opinion

James C. Conrad v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 10, 2006No. 04-15402PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.

After he was unsuccessfully prosecuted on charges involving an illegal gambling operation, James C. Conrad, a twenty-six-year veteran police officer, brought a Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) action against the federal government alleging false arrest, false imprisonment, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution. Conrad now appeals a summary judgment in favor of the government and a judgment on the merits in favor of the government. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Conrad’s appeal assigns error to three rulings by the district court: (1) the summary judgment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Tekle Ex Rel. Tekle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Gonzalez Ex Rel. A.F. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Roberts v. McAfee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Bolt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Soldano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API