Legal Opinion

Tate v. Sutherland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1947No. 30099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover for an agreed value of peas sold and delivered to defendant. After trial to the court, sitting without a jury, the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law. Thereafter, based upon its findings and conclusions, the court entered judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiff, appealing to this court, makes nine assignments of error, which attack the findings and judgment of the trial court.

We shall set out the pertinent undisputed facts and the testimony of some of the witnesses: Appellant was a farmer, living near Colfax, and respondent was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wiegardt v. BeckenWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Joyner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Walton v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Jensen v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jiri Mucha v. Charles KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API