Johnson v. Chicago Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Maurice Johnson sued his former employer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, see 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a)(l), 2000e-3(a), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He contends that in suspending him and later eliminating his job, the Chicago Transit Authority discriminated against him because of his sex and retaliated against him for complaining about discrimination. He also asserts that the CTA violated an Illinois law that governs staff reductions. The district court dismissed the state-law claim because it does not provide a private right of action, and it granted summary judgment for the CTA…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Henry Ortiz v. Werner Enterprises, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- William Radue v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Gross v. Town of Cicero, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Curtis Sauzek and Julian Koski v. Exxon Coal Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Brown v. Advocate South Suburban HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Keen v. Teva Sales & Mktg., Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Dubensky v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Keen v. Teva Sales and Marketing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- STRINGHAM v. CARMEL CLAY SCHOOLSDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024
- Vargas v. Northern Illinois Foot & Ankle Specialists, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025