Legal Opinion
Holt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 17, 1994No. Civ. A. 2:94-1418-18PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. This is an underinsured (UIM) insurance motorist case based on South Carolina law. The issue presented is whether the Defendant, State Farm, complied with South Carolina law and made a meaningful offer of UIM to the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs allege that the offer was defective and ask the court to reform three State Farm policies to provide UIM coverage for injuries Ms. Holt sustained in an automobile accident.
A. Facts
The facts of this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff Carol J. Holt was injured in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Perini Corporation v. Perini Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Laird v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Osborne v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Employee Resource Management, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
- Liberty Mut. Ins. v. EMPLOYEE RESOURCE MANAGEMENTDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2001