Legal Opinion
New York Life Insurance v. Rosen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 1, 1929PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The sole question here involved is whether the provisions of section 58 of the Insurance Law requiring a policy of insurance when issued to contain the entire contract between the parties and providing that nothing shall be incorporated therein by reference to any constitution, by-laws, rules, application or other writings, unless the same are indorsed upon or attached to the policy when issued, apply to the application for the reinstatement of a policy.
The New York Life Insurance Company has brought this action to cancel the reinstatement of a policy of life insurance because of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Archer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Linder v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Reidy v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Johnson v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3Cited by12 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. BuchbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- McMahon v. Continental Assurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. LordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Occidental Life Insurance Company of California v. FriedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965
- Schrader v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.