Schrader v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtO'Malley, J.
The plaintiff sues as beneficiary under a policy of life insurance issued by the defendant to plaintiff’s wife on April 15, 1929. By reason of the insured’s failure to pay premium, *645the policy lapsed in October of the same year and on December sixth following, the insured made application for reinstatement.
The defense to the action is predicated upon the claim that material misrepresentations and false statements made in the application for reinstatement voided the policy. In the application for reinstatement the insured, Mary Schrader, stated: “ I hereby certify that I am now in good health…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. PomerantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Saad v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Saad v. . New York Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- New York Life Insurance v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- New York Life Insurance Company v. RosenNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. BreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Rippel v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Axelroad v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Duke v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1937