Legal Opinion

In the Interest of G.T.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 Father, G.T., appeals from the trial court’s order changing the goal from reunification to adoption1 and terminating his parental rights2 of his two daughters. Essentially, G.T. complains that because a significant part of the transcript is missing and cannot be found, the trial court’s decision should be reversed and the case remanded for a new hearing. However, because G.T. is the appellant and has made no effort to re-create the record as is provided by our Rule of Appellate Procedure 1923, his argument fails. Moreover, there is sufficient evidence in the record to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. In re M.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. General Equipment Manufacturers v. Westfield InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Hart v. W.H. Stewart, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Interest of R.N.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API